Case LawHigh Court › R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commi...

R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Admn), Union Of India, Chennai-34

High Court 02 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Admn), Union Of India, Chennai-34
Date of order
02 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Admn), Union Of India, Chennai-34, the High Court (2023) decided the matter under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.08.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. B.BALAJICont. Petn. No.266 of 2019 R.Vasu ... Petitioner Vs. 1. B.Muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Admn), Union of India, Chennai-34. 2. Dr.Amar Veer Singh, The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai District 625 002. 3. Mr.D.Albert Manohar, The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range II, Maurai/Disciplinary Authority, Government of India, Income Tax Department, O/o Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range II, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai District 625 002. ... Respondents Page 1 of 4 Prayer: Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019 Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.14477/2014 dated 05.06.2014. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents: Mrs.Geetha Thamarai Selvan Spl.Govt. Pleader and Mr.V.Vijay Shankar for R1 to R3. ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.) The writ petitioner has filed the present contempt petition to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.14477/2014 dated 05.06.2014. 2. When the matter was listed hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that, the State Level Scrutiny Committee-II, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Departent, Secretariat, Chennai had considered the genuineness of the community certificate issued in favour of Thiru R.Vasu, s/o Ramasamy (petitioner herein) and found that he belongs to Hindu Page 2 of 4 Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019 Kattunayakan Community and hence, the community certificate issued to him is genuine. In this regard, the above said State Level Scrutiny Committee has also issued a proceedings No.12437/CV-3(1)/2015-12 dated 04.01.2022 and the same is placed before this Court. 3. Recording the above, this contempt petition is closed. (D.K.K.J.) (P.B.B.J.) 02.08.2023 (2/2) Internet: Yes/NoIndex : Yes/No mst Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4 Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and P. B.BALAJI, J. mst Contempt Petn. No.266 of 2019 02.08.2023(2/2)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan