R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Admn), Union Of India, Chennai-34
High Court
02 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Admn), Union Of India, Chennai-34
Date of order
02 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In R.vasu v. B.muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Admn), Union Of India, Chennai-34, the High Court (2023) decided the matter under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMARandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. B.BALAJICont. Petn. No.266 of 2019
R.Vasu
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. B.Muralikumar, The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Admn), Union of India, Chennai-34.
2. Dr.Amar Veer Singh, The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai District 625 002.
3. Mr.D.Albert Manohar,
The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range II, Maurai/Disciplinary Authority, Government of India, Income Tax Department, O/o Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range II, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Bibikulam, Madurai District 625 002.
... Respondents
Page 1 of 4
Prayer:
Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019
Prayer:Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the
Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the
order passed by this Court in W.P.No.14477/2014 dated 05.06.2014.
For Petitioner: Mr.R.Jayaprakash
For Respondents: Mrs.Geetha Thamarai Selvan
Spl.Govt. Pleader and
Mr.V.Vijay Shankar
for R1 to R3.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)
The writ petitioner has filed the present contempt petition to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.14477/2014 dated 05.06.2014.
2. When the matter was listed hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that, the State Level Scrutiny Committee-II, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Departent, Secretariat, Chennai had considered the genuineness of the community certificate issued in favour of Thiru R.Vasu, s/o Ramasamy (petitioner herein) and found that he belongs to Hindu
Page 2 of 4
Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019
Kattunayakan Community and hence, the community certificate issued to
him is genuine. In this regard, the above said State Level Scrutiny Committee has also issued a proceedings No.12437/CV-3(1)/2015-12 dated
04.01.2022 and the same is placed before this Court.
3. Recording the above, this contempt petition is closed.
(D.K.K.J.) (P.B.B.J.)
02.08.2023
(2/2)
Internet: Yes/NoIndex : Yes/No
mst
Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4
Cont.Petn.No.266 of 2019
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and P. B.BALAJI, J.
mst
Contempt Petn. No.266 of 2019
02.08.2023(2/2)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.