Case LawHigh Court › Sachin Prabhakar v. Chief Commissioner O...

Sachin Prabhakar v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Rajasthan,Income Tax Office, Ist Floor, Room

High Court 13 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Sachin Prabhakar v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Rajasthan,Income Tax Office, Ist Floor, Room
Date of order
13 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sachin Prabhakar v. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Rajasthan,Income Tax Office, Ist Floor, Room, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15959/2024 Sachin Prabhakar S/o Shri Omprakash Prabhakar, AgedAbout 44 Years, R/o Bhose No. - 73, BFH Block, ShalimarBagh, North West Delhi. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Rajasthan,Income Tax Office, Ist Floor, Room No. 101, Jaipur.Income Tax Office, Ist Floor, Room No. 101, Jaipur. 2. Pcit, Central Cirlce Jaipur, Income Tax Office, StatueCircle, Jaipur.Circle, Jaipur. 3. Alok Kumar Gupta, Proprietor M/s Shivani PropertiesAnd Constructions 79 Brijpuri, Airport Road,Jagatpura, Jaipur, Raj.And Constructions 79 Brijpuri, Airport Road,Jagatpura, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya For Respondent(s): JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/11/2024 1.After arguing for some time, learned counsel for thepetitioner has made a limited prayer for issuing directions tothe Income Tax Department (for short "the Department") todecide the application filed by the petitioner under Section132 (10) of the Income Tax Act. 2.Counsel submits that the said application submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the Department in-spite of passing of considerable time, therefore, appropriatedirections be issued to the Department to decide the sameexpeditiously, as early as possible within a time frame. 3.Considering the above, the instant writ petition standsdisposed of with directions to the Income Tax Departmentto decide the application filed by the petitioner (pending, ifany) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within aperiod of three months, strictly in accordance with law, afteraffording due opportunity of hearing to all the respectiveparties. 4.Before parting with this order, it is made clear that thisCourt has not issued any order/direction to the respondentsto decide the application in a particular way. TheDepartment would be at liberty to decide the same strictly inaccordance with law. 5.The stay application and all pending applications, ifany, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/53
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan