Case LawHigh Court › Sadbhav Enterprises Private Limited v. O...

Sadbhav Enterprises Private Limited v. Oral Order

High Court 02 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Sadbhav Enterprises Private Limited v. Oral Order
Date of order
02 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sadbhav Enterprises Private Limited v. Oral Order, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: The Petition is disposed of as not pressed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/SCA/9009/2021 ORDER DATED: 02/08/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9009 of 2021 ==========================================================SADBHAV ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED Versus OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, APPEAL 10 ==========================================================Appearance:MR.ANKIT M TALSANIA(7300) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1TIRTH NAYAK(8563) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MR DEVANG VYAS(2794) for the Respondent(s) No. 2MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Respondent(s) No. 1NOTICE UNSERVED(8) for the Respondent(s) No. 3========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDIandHONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI Date : 02/08/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI) The learned Senior Counsel Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt for the Respondentseeks permission to place on record the communication dated 16.7.2021, to theeffect that the delay occurred in filing the Appeal by the Petitioner before theCIT (Appeals) has already been condoned. The said communication is taken on record. Learned Advocate Mrs. Bhatt further states that in view of the saidcommunication, the Declaration filed by the Petitioner shall be reconsidered bythe concerned authority under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, inaccordance with law. In view of the above, the learned Advocate Mr. Ankit M. Talsania forthe Petitioner does not press for this Petition at this juncture. The Petition is disposed of as not pressed for. The Declaration of the Petitioner shall be considered by the concerned authority afresh and inaccordance with law. (BELA M. TRIVEDI, J) (A. C. JOSHI,J) J.N.W
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan