Sadhna Talkies v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
05 Sep 2000 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Sadhna Talkies v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
05 Sep 2000
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sadhna Talkies v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2000) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SADHNA TALKIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JP SHAH for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT for Responden...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 46 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SADHNA TALKIES
Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JP SHAH for Petitioner
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI
and
MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 05/09/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Per Dharmadhikari, C.J.:
Learned counsel appearing for the assessee at whose
instance this reference has been made , submits that he has been instructed by the assessee not to press this Reference. He submits that the assessee is willing to abide by the order of the Appellate Tribunal. On the above statement being made, we do not think it necessary
has been instructed by the assessee not to press this Reference. He submits that the assessee is willing to abide by the order of the Appellate Tribunal. On the above statement being made, we do not think it necessary to answer the question referred to us.
The Reference accordingly stands disposed of, with no
order as to costs.
���(D. M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.)
���(A. R. Dave,J.)
parekh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.