Sadhna Talkies v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
10 Jul 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Sadhna Talkies v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
10 Jul 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sadhna Talkies v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO ------------------------------------------------------------- SADHNA TALKIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 57 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
------------------------------------------------------------- SADHNA TALKIES
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 57 of 1986
MR Manish Shah for JP SHAH for Petitioner No. 1
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 10/07/2001
1.�Heard learned advocate Shri Manish Shah for Shri J. P. Shah for the assessee and Shri Akil Kureshi, learned advocate for the respondent.
2.�Learned counsel appearing for the assessee, at whose instance this reference has been made, submits that he has been instructed by the assessee not to press this Reference. He submits that the assessee is willing to abide by the order of the Appellate Tribunal. On the above statement being made, we do not think it necessary to answer the question referred to us.
�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with
no order as to costs.
10.7.2001.����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
/phalguni/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.