Sae Space Creators, A Partnership Frm v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Apr 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Sae Space Creators, A Partnership Frm v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sae Space Creators, A Partnership Frm v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2023.04.2916:10:34+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4044 OF 2023
Sae Space Creators, A partnership frm having its address at :1/7, Shaukat Manzil, Off. Nehru Nagar Road,Pimpri, Pune 411 018PAN : ADDFS3132P
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Pune-3 & 3 Ors.…Respondents
*****
Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar a/w. Mr.Rohan Deshpande i/b FarzeenKhambatta, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM : DATE :
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &KAMAL KHATA, J.J.
27[th ] APRIL, 2023.
P C :
1.The petitioner challenges the impugned order dated 27[th]
January 2023 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax,Pune-3 whereby the prayer of the petitioner for staying the entiredemand has been rejected.
2.The order impugned is a speaking order which has been
passed after considering various contentions placed before the saidauthority. We fnd no perversity in the order impugned.
3.The petition is found without any merit and hence isaccordingly dismissed.
[ KAMAL KHATA, J. ]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue