Case LawHigh Court › Safo/19/1984 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Safo/19/1984 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Lucknow v. The Varanasi Upnivesan Avas Evam Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Varanasi

High Court 14 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Safo/19/1984 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Lucknow v. The Varanasi Upnivesan Avas Evam Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Varanasi
Date of order
14 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Safo/19/1984 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Lucknow v. The Varanasi Upnivesan Avas Evam Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Varanasi, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Second Appeal From Order is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case :- SECOND APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 19 of 1984Appellant :- The Commissioner Of Income Tax LucknowRespondent :- The Varanasi Upnivesan Avas Evam Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, VaranasiCounsel for Appellant :- Bharat Ji AgarwalCounsel for Respondent :- R.K. Gulati Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Case called out in the revised list. None has appeared for the parties. The Second Appeal From Order is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. Digitally signed by ANJANI Order Date :- 14.5.2018KUMAR MISHRADN: C=IN, O=Personal, PostalCode=211001, RKMS=Uttar Pradesh, Phone=f6e3ce979d8983acfANJANI c0b3ea049885bf64ad5bbb33050e3dfe3e210927d94f413, KUMAR SERIALNUMBER=004ee64f25f9f36f85dbdc71f5b0ec1e2f0938431e25dbbadc93823MISHRA915b36c6f, CN=ANJANI KUMAR MISHRAReason: I am the author of this documentLocation: Date: 2018-05-14 16:09:40
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan