Sajun Pal v. Respondent
High Court
01 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Sajun Pal v. Respondent
Date of order
01 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sajun Pal v. Respondent, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
r.^
IN IUE UQN'BLE HIGH COUBJ QE CHHAFEISGARH ATBILASPUR fC.G.tSECQND AEPEAL NOO^fr2^QE 2010 '^ ^KW
APPELLANIDEFENDANT
,y^>>y...^•-^f^^y,'L^-'\6.1-;^'^'.^'?^^--''^y^^
1.t
RESPQNDENISPLAINTIFFS
Sajun Pal, aged about 52 years,R/Q thmugh Jagatram Kosle S/QShri JethuRamKosle,BhartiyaNagar,in frontQf Income TaxQffice,BehindQfSalujaVihar,Bilaspur,TahsilandDistrictBilaspur (C.G.).
VERSUS
Smt. Rejina Bada, aged about 70years, wife Qf Samual Bada, R/QBhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.).
2.t-3.
Smt. Amrita Tirkey, aged abQut34 years, wife of Suresh Tirkey,
Smt.Anjela Tirkey,aged about39years,wifeofPankhariyusMinj,
Respondent No.2 and 3 are R/QPQlice Line, Tifra, Bilaspur, Tahsiland District Bilaspur (C.G.).
MEMQRANDUM DE APPEAL UNDE& SECTIQN 100 QE IHE CQDE
QE CIVIL P&QCEDU&E. 19Q8
•:5-s; ~^'^T^, W^ TS, faoK-iy
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue