Case LawHigh Court › Sakhar Karkhana Limited v. Deputy Commis...

Sakhar Karkhana Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 03 Oct 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sakhar Karkhana Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
03 Oct 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sakhar Karkhana Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON NOTICE OF MOTION NO.762 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1018 OF 2005 Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited .. Appellant. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Special Range III, Solapur .. Respondent. Mr.S.S. Patwardhan for the Appellant. Mr.Shiv Motaria i/by Ms.P.P. Bhosale for the respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE, & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2006. P.C. : 1. This notice of motion by the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 225 days in filing the appeal. Supporting affidavit of a authorised signatory of the appellant-society is filed. Para 3 and 4 of this affidavit explains the reasons why delay was caused. 2. Mr.Motaria appearing for the revenue leaves it to the Court to pass appropriate order. Accordingly, we grant this notice of motion in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay condoned. The appeal be numbered. 3. The notice of motion stands disposed of. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan