Sakthi Realty Holdings Ltdno v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle
High Court
23 Oct 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Sakthi Realty Holdings Ltdno v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle
Date of order
23 Oct 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sakthi Realty Holdings Ltdno v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Circle, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in TCA SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.10.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
C.M.P.Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025in T.C.A. SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025
C.M.P.No.25252 of 2025:
Sakthi Realty Holdings LtdNo.62, Nanjappa Road, Coimbatore – 641 018.
Vs
The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle -2, 63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore – 641 018.
C.M.P.No.25268 of 2025:
Applicant
Respondent
Tharanipathy Rajkumar2-2, TSA Niayam, Thathur, Pollachi-642 104.
Vs
The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle-1, Coimbatore-641 108.
Applicant
Respondent
___________
Page 1 of 3
CMP Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in TCA SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025
For Applicant:
M/s.Amritha Sathyajith
For Respondent:
Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arun Kumar
Sr. Standing Counsel
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard.
2. These applications have been filed by the applicants to
condone the delay of 6 days in filing the appeals.
3. Though learned counsel for the respondent opposes the
applications and prays for time to file counter-affidavit, we are inclined to condone the delay, as the delay is of only 6 days.
___________
Page 2 of 3
CMP Nos.25252 and 25268 of 2025 in TCA SR Nos.125583 and 125584 of 2025
4. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the applications are
allowed.
List the appeals for admission.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 23.10.2025
bbr
___________
Page 3 of 3
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.