Sakuma Exports Ltd v. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 & Ors
High Court
08 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sakuma Exports Ltd v. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 & Ors
Date of order
08 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Sakuma Exports Ltd v. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In view of the, Writ Petition is disposed of. [ S.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1420 OF 2019
Sakuma Exports Ltd..Petitioner
Versus
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 & Ors...Respondents
...................
Mr. Vipul Joshi a/w Mr. D.P. Fotaria i/by Ms. N.S. Kasale for thePetitionerMr. Vipul Joshi a/w Mr. D.P. Fotaria i/by Ms. N.S. Kasale for thePetitioner
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No. 1Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 2Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 2
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JULY 8, 2019.
P.C.:
1.The petitioner has challenged an order dated 20.2.2019
transferring the petitioner's assessment from Mumbai toPune in purported exercise of powers under Section 127(2) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short).
2.The admitted facts are that the impugned order hasbeen passed without issuing any notice to the petitioner,without affording any opportunity of hearing and withoutciting any reasons. On all three grounds therefore, the
impugned order is bad in law. The same is therefore, setaside. However, nothing stated in this order would preventthe respondents from initiating fresh action and passingfresh orders in accordance with law for transfer ofassessment, if so advised.
3.In view of the, Writ Petition is disposed of.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.