Case Law › High Court › Sameer Gehlaut v. Deputy Commissioner Of...

Sameer Gehlaut v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 6(4), Mumbai & Anr

High Court 08 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

08 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Sameer Gehlaut v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 6(4), Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

SANTOSHSUBHASHKULKARNIDigitally signed bySANTOSH SUBHASHKULKARNIDate: 2022.03.0911:29:52 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 736 OF 2022ANDWRIT PETITION NO. 740 OF 2022ANDWRIT PETITION NO. 779 OF 2022 Sameer Gehlaut ...Petitioner Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 6(4), Mumbai & anr. ...Respondents Mr. K. Gopal, a/w Mr. Jitendra Singh, Ms. Neha Paranjpeand Mr. Om Kandalkar, for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents. CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJDATED:8[th] MARCH, 2022 -PC: 1.After the petition was heard for sometime, Mr. Gopal, oninstructions, sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petitionswith liberty to raise all contentions before the concernedauthority. 2.Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [K. R. SHRIRAM, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.