Case LawHigh Court › Samir Chhabra & Anr v. The Commissioner...

Samir Chhabra & Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Viii & Ors

High Court 03 Nov 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Samir Chhabra & Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Viii & Ors
Date of order
03 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Samir Chhabra & Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Viii & Ors, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 7333/2015 SAMIR CHHABRA & ANR...... PetitionersThrough:Mr Manu K. Giri, Mr Rajesh Mahna andMs Savita Rustogi versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- VIII & ORS. ..... RespondentsThrough:Mr Dileep Shivpuri and Mr Sanjay Kumar CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R D E R %03.11.2015 On the previous occasion, that is, on 06.10.2015 we had passed the following order:- “Once again, a request has been made on behalf of therespondents to take instructions with regard to the return of thepetitioners' share certificates. This is a final opportunity. Ifinstructions are not obtained, we may be constrained to direct thereturn of the shares forthwith. Renotify on 03.11.2015.” The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that he has no instructions. As a result, we direct that the Share Certificates, as also all other seized documents / articles which have not yet been returned to the petitioners, be returned to the petitioners within four weeks. The writ petition stands disposed of. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J NOVEMBER 03, 2015SU SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan