Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3(1
High Court
22 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3(1
Date of order
22 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 3(1, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the statement made, the writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 1195/2018
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Himanshu Sinha, Ms. Vrinda Tulshan and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopan, Advocates.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)
(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R22.03.2018
Learned counsel for the parties state that the writ petition may be disposed of as Tribunal has heard the appeals after relisting on 26[th]February, 2018. The recoveries, if any, would be made in accordance with law after final order is passed by the Tribunal.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
MARCH 22, 2018 MR/pk
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue