Case LawHigh Court › Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd v. Pr...

Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax New Delhi & Anr

High Court 28 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
28 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Writ petition is disposed of without any order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 86/2018 SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Himanshu Sinha, Ms.Vrinda Tulshan, Mr.Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advs. versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 28.02.2018 Counsel for the respondents states that counter affidavit has been e-filed today. Hard copy of the counter affidavit has been furnished in the Court. Counsel for the respondents states that the respondents join the petitioner in praying for expeditious and early disposal of the appeals pending in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. During the course of hearing, counsel for the petitioner has stated that three appeals for two years were heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 31[st] January, 2018 and orders have been reserved. Most of the issues are common and the decision/order in the said appeals would be applicable in other appeal. In view of the aforesaid position, no further order or direction is required. We however hope and trust that both the petitioner and the respondents would ensure that hearing in appeals are not delayed by seeking adjournments. Writ petition is disposed of without any order as to costs. SANJIV KHANNA, J. FEBRUARY 28, 2018 MR/pk CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan