Samta Chhajer Daughter Of Shri Babulal Ghosal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3), Jaipur
High Court
16 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Samta Chhajer Daughter Of Shri Babulal Ghosal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3), Jaipur
Date of order
16 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Samta Chhajer Daughter Of Shri Babulal Ghosal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3), Jaipur, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4225/2022
Samta Chhajer Daughter Of Shri Babulal Ghosal, Aged About 43Years, Resident Of 204-A, Vaishist Marg, Pratap Nagar, KhatipuraRoad, Jaipur 302021
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3), Jaipur Having Its Address AtNew Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur -302005
2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, Having ItsAddress At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through ItsChairman.Address At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through ItsChairman.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
16/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit thatthe issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it has beenput to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decision renderedon 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) &Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions)where the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,1961 have been found to be invalid and impermissible in law andquashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.