Samtel Avionics Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
17 May 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Samtel Avionics Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
17 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Samtel Avionics Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: No further directions are called for in the present petition and the same is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI43
+ W.P.(C) 5388/2019
SAMTEL AVIONICS LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Kavita Jha and Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates.
versus
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr Raghvendra Kishore Singh, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr Vipul Agrawal, Junior Standing Counsel for the Revenue.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R% 17.05.2019
CM 23663-23664/2019 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 5388/2019
2. Learned counsel for the Revenue, who appears on advance notice, has handed over to the Court a copy of an email dated 16[th] May, 2019 written by the Department confirming that the refund claim of the Petitioner determined at Rs.40,92,660/-, including interest under Section 244 A of the Income Tax Act has been processed and it has been sent to the concerned bank on 16[th]May, 2019 for onwards transmission to the Assessee’s bank through ECS.
3. No further directions are called for in the present petition and the same is
accordingly disposed of.
4. In the event that there is any unusual delay in the Petitioner’s receiving refund, it will be open to the Petitioner to revive the petition.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
MAY 17, 2019 rd
I.S. MEHTA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.