Sanjay Dyandeo Patil v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income (Central), Pune & Ors
High Court
12 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Sanjay Dyandeo Patil v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income (Central), Pune & Ors
Date of order
12 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sanjay Dyandeo Patil v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income (Central), Pune & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6903 OF 2018
Sanjay Dyandeo Patil..Petitioner
Versus
Pr. Commissioner of Income (Central), Pune & Ors..Respondents
...................
Mr. Jehangir Mistri, Sr. Counsel a/w Mr. Niraj Sheth, Mr. UpendraLokegaonkar i/by Mint & Confreres for the Petitioner Mr. Jehangir Mistri, Sr. Counsel a/w Mr. Niraj Sheth, Mr. UpendraLokegaonkar i/by Mint & Confreres for the Petitioner •Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 1Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 1
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions,
sought permission to withdraw the petition. Permissiongranted. Disposed of as withdrawn.
2.Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated.
[ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue