Sanjay Goyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
High Court
28 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Sanjay Goyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
28 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Sanjay Goyal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4158/2022
Sanjay Goyal S/o Sh. Om Prakash, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 2/206,Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur-302001, Rajasthan, India.
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, Sikar, Todi Nagar, Sanwali Road, Sikar-332001, Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Javed Khan Advocate.
For Respondents: Mr. N.S. Bhati Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anuroop Singhi Advocate.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAINOrder
28/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset wouldsubmit that the issue involved in this petition is no longer res integraas it has been put to an end by Division Bench of this Court in thedecision rendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income TaxOfficer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 andbatch of petitions) where the notices issued under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid andimpermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counselfor the petitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, forthe reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in theaforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition isallowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.