In Sanjay Janardan Phadke v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Pune, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12896 OF 2014 IN ITAST/33781/2014
SANJAY JANARDAN PHADKE VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PUNE
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chandak Raviraj R. AGP for Respondents: Mr. D. V. Soman.
***CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ.DATED: 24th APRIL, 2015.
PER COURT:
1.We have heard learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Soman learned counsel opposes the application on the ground that no sufficient cause is spelt out.
2.We have considered the averments in the application. The averments in the application are not controverted. For the averments made in the application, the civil application is allowed and disposed of.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.]Dt.24/04/2015ans/12896
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue