Sanjay Kumar Baheti v. Principal Comissioner Of Income Tax, Income Taxdepartment, Bikaner.department, Bikaner
High Court
01 Dec 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Sanjay Kumar Baheti v. Principal Comissioner Of Income Tax, Income Taxdepartment, Bikaner.department, Bikaner
Date of order
01 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sanjay Kumar Baheti v. Principal Comissioner Of Income Tax, Income Taxdepartment, Bikaner.department, Bikaner, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.With liberty as prayed, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10698/2021
Sanjay Kumar Baheti S/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 42 Years,R/o Ward No. 8, Himmatsar, Nokha, Bikaner (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Principal Comissioner Of Income Tax, Income TaxDepartment, Bikaner.Department, Bikaner.
2. Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigation), IncomeTax Department, Bikaner (Raj.).Tax Department, Bikaner (Raj.).
3. Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department Ward Nokha,Bikaner (Raj.).Bikaner (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh MathurFor Respondent(s): -
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
01/12/2021
Order
1.The present writ petition is directed against the notice dated31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,1961.31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,1961.
2.Mr. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to filehis objection before the assessing authority in light of judgment ofthe Hon’ble the Supreme Court rendered in case of GKNDriveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors. reported in2003 1 SCC 72.
3.With liberty as prayed, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
4.Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
25-Rahul/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.