Sanjay Kumar Singh, Male v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, Bihar
High Court
17 Apr 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Sanjay Kumar Singh, Male v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Date of order
17 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sanjay Kumar Singh, Male v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19984 of 2021
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Singh, Male, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Aditya NarayanSingh resident of 173/A, Near New Police Line, Awash Nagar, Road No. 1,M.I.T. Muzaffarpur, Bihar - 842003.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, Bihar having its office at Bela,Muzaffarpur.Muzaffarpur.
2.Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore.
3.Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (1), Muzaffarpur.
4.Bihar State Beverage Corporation Limited, Muzaffarpur.
617-04-2023
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr. D.V. Pathy, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s:
Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASADORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
As requested on behalf of the petitioner, the writ
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
Shyambihari/Raj Kishore/-
U
( Madhuresh Prasad, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue