Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Sanjay Ramkrishna Jagtap v. Income Tax O...

Sanjay Ramkrishna Jagtap v. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1 (2), Nagpur & Ors

High Court 13 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· testcase
Parties
Sanjay Ramkrishna Jagtap v. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1 (2), Nagpur & Ors
Date of order
13 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Sanjay Ramkrishna Jagtap v. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1 (2), Nagpur & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1515 OF 2022 Sanjay Ramkrishna Jagtap Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1 (2), Nagpur & Ors. -- Petitioner/s -- Respondent/s Mr. Kapil Hirani, Advocate for the Petitioner.Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ. DATE : 13 APRIL 2022. P. C.: The Petitioner has challenged the notice issued underSection 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for re-assessment ofincome. 2.Learned Counsel for the Respondents points out thatthe return filed by the Petitioner has been accepted and there is noaddition, and therefore, it is not necessary to examine the challengeto the notice as it would be academic. 3.Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the legalchallenge to the notice be continued as in future the factum ofissuance of notice may be held against the Petitioner. 4.We do not intend to examine this aspect in abstract. Asand when such eventuality arises, it is open to the Petitioner toagitate the points which are raised in this petition. 5.With these clarifications, the Writ Petition is disposedof. [ ANIL L. PANSARE, J. ] [ NITIN JAMDAR, J. ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan