Case Law › High Court › Sanjaykriplani v. M/S Fountainheadmotelp...

Sanjaykriplani v. M/S Fountainheadmotelpvtltd &Ors &Orsors

High Court 11 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

11 Jul 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sanjaykriplani v. M/S Fountainheadmotelpvtltd &Ors &Orsors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~18& 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +FAO(OS) 110/2016+FAO(OS)298/2016& CM38450/2016 SANJAYKRIPLANI .....AppellantThrough;Mr Arjun SinghBawawith Ms AmbikaVohra versus M/S FOUNTAINHEADMOTELPVTLTD &ORS &ORSORS PVTLTD &ORS &ORSORSRespondentsThrough:Mr J.P. Sengh,SeniorAdvocatewithMr Puneet Agrawal and Ms ManishaMehta for R-1, 6 & 7.Mr Vedanta Varma with Mr AkhilKumar Gola for R-1 & 3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADARDURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORDER%09.12.2016 We have heard the learnedcounselfor the parties. The learnedcounselforthe appellantdoes not pressFAO(OS)110/2016and it is dismissedas such. Insofaras the questionof leadingevidencethrough video conferencingisconcerned, which is essentiallythe subject matter of FAO(OS) 298/2016, it isagreed that the evidence'ofPWl (Mr Sanjay Kriplani),who is in San Francisco,USA would be recorded through video conferencingon 23.01.2017,24.01.2017and 25.01.2017. The same shall be conductedin terms ofthe Video ConferencingGuidelinesissued by this Court. No adjournmentswould be requestedby either insofaras theof evidenceof PWl is concerned. For theparty recording tying up Signature Not Verified modalities for the video conferencing,the matter be placed before the JointIRegistrar on 23.12.2016.' t•,'' FAO(OS)110/2016 stands dismissed as above and FAO(OS)t• 298/2016,''stands disposed of in tems of the above directions. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J ASHUTOSH KUMAR, JDECEMBER 09, 2016SR

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.