Case Law › High Court › Sanjeev Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Nabh...

Sanjeev Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Nabha Railway Road, Nabha, District Patiala

High Court 22 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

22 Dec 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sanjeev Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Nabha Railway Road, Nabha, District Patiala, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: CHAUDHARI)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: |Yes.

Decision: The petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty toadopt appropriate proceedings under the Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26673 OF 2016 DATE OF DECISION : 22[nd]DECEMBER, 2016 Sanjeev Kumar . Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer Nabha Railway Road, Nabha, District Patiala . Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE 8S. J. VAZIFDARHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE A. B. CHAUDHAR ee Present :Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. ee S. J. VAZIFDAR, CJ. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner statesthat the petitioner will raise the grounds of non-service in proceedingsunder the Act itself and therefore, seeks to withdraw this writ petitionwith liberty to do so. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty toadopt appropriate proceedings under the Act. 9)[nd]December, 2016TQ) | (S. J. VAZIFDAR)CHIEF JUSTICE. (A. B. CHAUDHARI)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: |Yes. Whether Reportable: |Yes. No|No..

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.