In Sanjeev Woolen Mills v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of a praecipe dated6/10/2021 filed by the Petitioner and not through the learnedAdvocate, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2588 OF 2019
Sanjeev Woolen Mills
vs.The Chief Commissioner of IncomeTax-7
...Petitioner
...Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
---
---
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 12[th] OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :
None for the Petitioner. In view of a praecipe dated6/10/2021 filed by the Petitioner and not through the learnedAdvocate, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Digitally signedby RAJESHWARIRAJESHWARISUBODHSUBODHKARVEKARVEDate:2021.10.1316:59:54 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue