Case LawHigh Court › Santhi Medical Agenciesrep.by Managing P...

Santhi Medical Agenciesrep.by Managing Partnersri Suriyanarayananno v. The President The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Bench, Chennai

High Court 20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Santhi Medical Agenciesrep.by Managing Partnersri Suriyanarayananno v. The President The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Bench, Chennai
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Santhi Medical Agenciesrep.by Managing Partnersri Suriyanarayananno v. The President The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Bench, Chennai, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence,the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.02.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.9992 of 2006 Santhi Medical Agenciesrep.by Managing PartnerSri SuriyanarayananNo.16, V Cross StreetTrustpuram, Chennai 600 024. .. Petitioner -Vs- 1.The President The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Bench, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal IV, Madras-34. 3.Income Tax Officer, City Ward-V(2) Chennai. .. Respondents For Petitioner: No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing Counsel Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India praying for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus callingfor the entire records relating to the impugned order in ITANo.2703/Mds/96 date 27.01.2004 of the 1[st] respondent and quashthe same and direct the first respondent to dispose the matteron merits. O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) None appeared for the petitioner during the last date ofhearing on 11.02.2020 and this Court passed the followingorder. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ "None present for the Assessee. By the impugned orderof the ITA dated 27.01.2014, the ITA was alsodismissed the appeal of the Assessee for want ofprosecution. However, in the interest of justice, weadjourn the case and post it on 20.02.2020 under thecategory "For Dismissal". Put up the case on 20.02.2020 under the caption "ForDismissal". If none appears on that day also, thisCourt may dismiss the case itself for want ofprosecution." 2. Today also, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence,the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Nocosts. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V)//True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarKSTTo1.The President, The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chennai Bench, Chennai.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Appeal IV, Madras-34. 3.Income Tax Officer, City Ward-V(2),Chennai +1cc to Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.14728 NMI(CO)CS/22/05/2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan