Santokh Singh v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-Ii Ludhiana Andothers
High Court
28 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Santokh Singh v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-Ii Ludhiana Andothers
Date of order
28 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Santokh Singh v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-Ii Ludhiana Andothers, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 5101 of 2005 (O&M)Date of Decision: April 28, 2009
Santokh Singh
Versus
...Petitioner
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-II Ludhiana andothers
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA
Present:Mr. Devinder Goyal, Advocate,
for Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate,
for the respondents.
1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported inthe Digest?
M.M. KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the parties states that after admissionof the petition, assessment has been framed and in pursuance to theassessment refund has also been paid to the petitioner-assessee.Accordingly, the parties are pursuing their departmental remedyprovided by the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The writ petition as such has been rendered infructuous.Ordered accordingly.
(M.M. KUMAR)JUDGE
April 28, 2009
Pkapoor
(H.S. BHALLA)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue