In Santosh Kumar Patro v. The Income Tax Officer, Berhampur, Ganjam And Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: PATTANAIK ORDER08.02.2022 For the reasons stated in the order passed today in ITA No.1 of 2010 pertaining to the same Assessee for the Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03, the present appeal which pertains to the AY 2004-05 is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK I. T. A. No.2 of 2010
….AppellantMr. Raj Mohanty, Advocate….Respondents
Santosh Kumar Patro
-versus-
The Income Tax Officer, Berhampur, Ganjam and others
Mr. T. K. Satpathy, Senior Standing Counsel
for the Income Tax Department
Order No.
04.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER08.02.2022
For the reasons stated in the order passed today in ITA No.1 of
2010 pertaining to the same Assessee for the Assessment Year
(AY) 2002-03, the present appeal which pertains to the AY 2004-05 is also dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
M. Panda
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue