Santosh S Mukta v. The Asstt Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Cir 2 Aurangabad And Others
High Court
15 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Santosh S Mukta v. The Asstt Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Cir 2 Aurangabad And Others
Date of order
15 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Santosh S Mukta v. The Asstt Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Cir 2 Aurangabad And Others, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
WP.11475-18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
39 WRIT PETITION NO. 11475 OF 2018
SANTOSH S MUKTA VERSUS
THE ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIR 2 AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
...
Mr. R.R.Chandak & M.K.Kulkarni, Advocates for PetitionerMr. Sharma Alok M., Advocate for Respondent No.1
…
CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND
MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.DATE : 15.10.2018
PER COURT:-
1.It is informed that the petitioner has already availed of an alternate remedy of appeal and the same is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). It is further informed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the scrutiny report has been drawn by the appellate authority.
2.In the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the controversy, the ends of justice would be met in directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) to decide the pending appeal presented by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of
2
three months from today and it is accordingly directed. Writ
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
vmk/-
(R.M.BORDE, J.)
…
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue