Case LawHigh Court › Santram Spinners Pvt.ltd v. The Commisso...

Santram Spinners Pvt.ltd v. The Commissoner Of Income Tax Gujarat - 1

High Court 24 Jun 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Santram Spinners Pvt.ltd v. The Commissoner Of Income Tax Gujarat - 1
Date of order
24 Jun 2004
Assessment year(s)
1990-91
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Santram Spinners Pvt.ltd v. The Commissoner Of Income Tax Gujarat - 1, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SANTRAM SPINNERS PVT.LTD.

Decision: Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3643 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SANTRAM SPINNERS PVT.LTD. Versus THE COMMISSONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARAT - 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 3643 of 1994 MR TUSHAR P HEMANI for MR SN SOPARKAR, Sr. Advocate for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 24/06/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �Mr Tushar Hemani appearing for Mr SN Soparkar for the petitioner seeks leave to place on record a copy of the order dated 10.4.2001 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad for the same AY 1990-91 and states that in view of the said order, the present Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad for the same AY 1990-91 and states that in view of the said order, the present petition has become infructuous. Mr Hemani, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. �The order dated 10.4.2001 of the Tribunal is taken on record. �Leave as prayed for is granted. Accordingly, the taken on record. �Leave as prayed for is granted. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Ad-interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. �Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. �����(M.S. Shah, J.) �����(D.A. Mehta, J.) sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan