Sara Proenca v. Income-Tax Officer
High Court
01 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Sara Proenca v. Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
01 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sara Proenca v. Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Both these Appeals are disposed of as Nutan D.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 txas11,12-12dt.01-10-19
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEALS NO.11 & 12 OF 2012TAX APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2012
Dr. Joao Souza Proenca. .....Appellant. VersusIncome-tax Officer. .....Respondent.
TAX APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2012
Sara Proenca.
.....
Versus
Income-tax Officer. .....
Appellant.
Respondent.
Mr. Purushottam Karpe, Advocate for the for Appellants.
Ms. T. Ferreira, holding for Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel forthe Respondent.
Coram : M.S. Sonak & Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ. Date : 1st October, 2019.
Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ.
P.C.:-
Mr. Purushottam Karpe, learned Counsel for theAppellants, on the basis of the instructions from the Appellants, seeksleave to withdraw these Appeals.
2.withdrawn.
Leave is granted. Both these Appeals are disposed of as
Nutan D. Sardessai, J. M.S. Sonak, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue