Sarang v. Kotwal, J.) (Akil Kureshi, J
High Court
12 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sarang v. Kotwal, J.) (Akil Kureshi, J
Date of order
12 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sarang v. Kotwal, J.) (Akil Kureshi, J, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.452 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-23
V/s.Shri Hemant Kumar Godara
… Appellant
… Respondent
---
Mr.Sham Walve for the Appellant.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SARANG V.KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act) challenges the order passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal).
2.Mr.Sham Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press this appeal. This for thereason that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs asprovided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018.
3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue