Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj.: 05[Th] April, 2019
High Court
05 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj.: 05[Th] April, 2019
Date of order
05 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj.: 05[Th] April, 2019, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.886 OF 2019
Sterling Oil Resources Ltd..... PetitionerversusAssistant Commissioner Income TaxCircle-13(2)(2)... Respondent
…....
Mr.C.S. Agarwal, Senior Counsel a/w Mr.Ravi Mall a/w Mr.Sankalp Sharma i/b. Ms. Rutuja Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner.Mr.C.S. Agarwal, Senior Counsel a/w Mr.Ravi Mall a/w Mr.Sankalp Sharma i/b. Ms. Rutuja Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma, Advocate for Respondent.Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.: 05[th] APRIL, 2019.
DATE
P.C. :
1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner sought permission
to withdraw, keeping all contentions open.
2. Permission as prayed for granted.
3. Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue