In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 398 OF 2019
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1103 OF 2018
Sunil B. Vorani (HUF).. Applicant
In the Matter Between:
Sunil B. Vorani (HUF).. AppellantVersusIncome Tax OfÏcer -17(3)(4).. Respondent
...................
•Ms. Ruchi Rathod i/by Ratan Samal for the Applicant
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : MAY 3, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Heard.
2.This Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration of
appeal which was dismissed pursuant to the order dated22.11.2018 passed by the Prothonotory and Senior Master.
3.For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion, the sameis allowed in terms of prayer clauses (1) to (3).
4.Dela of filing the Notice of Motion is also condoned.
5.Time of eight weeks is granted to remove ofÏceobjections.
[ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue