In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 369 OF 2019
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 307 OF 2018
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-34,Mumbai... Applicant
In the Matter Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-34,Mumbai... Appellant
VersusMs. Minaxi Choksi
.. Respondent
...................
Mr. A.R. Malhotra with Mr. N.A. Kazi for the Appellant Mr. A.R. Malhotra with Mr. N.A. Kazi for the Appellant
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : MAY 3, 2019.
P.C.:
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out to set aside the order
dated 5.2.2019 pursuant to which the appeal was disposedof. There is delay of 172 days in taking out this Notice ofMotion.
2.For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion, the same
is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
3.Time of eight weeks is granted to remove ofÏceobjections.
[ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue