Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj
High Court
30 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj
Date of order
30 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
115 itxa 333-17 with chs 210-19-o-k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.333 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2… Appellant
V/s.
Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay.… Respondent
WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.210 OF 2019ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.333 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Pune … Applicant/Appellant
V/s.M/s Pranav Agro Industries Ltd. and Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay. … Respondents
---
Mr.Sham Walve for the Applicant.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 30, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This chamber summons is taken out for amending the title
to add name of the respondent. For the reasons mentioned in theaffidavit-in-support of the chamber summons, prayer (a) isallowed. The amendment be carried out forthwith.
Priya Soparkar215 itxa 333-17 with chs 210-19-o-k
2.Issue notice to the Official Liquidator returnable after 8
weeks.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue