Case Law › High Court › Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj

Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj

High Court 26 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Apr 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Priya Soparkar 149 nma 374-19 in itxa 125-17-o-k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OFMOTION NO.374 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.125 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai.… Applicant/ Appellant V/s. M/s Swananda Properties Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent --- Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr.Dharan Gandhi i/by Mr.Subhash Shetty for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : APRIL 26, 2019. P.C.:- 1.This notice of motion is taken out for restoration of theappeal which was dismissed for default. For the reasonsmentioned in the affidavit-in-support of notice of motion, noticeof motion is made absolute in the above terms. The appeal isrestored to file. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.) ….

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.