In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
154 nma 353-19 in itxal 1884-18-o-k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.353 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1884 OF 2018
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2… Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
State Bank of India… Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Applicant/Appellant.Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delay
of 3 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in theaffidavit filed alongwith this notice of motion, the delay iscondoned. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a).
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue