In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2611 OF 2028
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-28
… Appellant
V/s.
M.Lachhmandas & Co.
… Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr.Deepak Tralshawala i/by Mr.V.S.Hadade for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 22, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (the Act) challenges the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the
Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press thisappeal. This for the reason that the tax effect in this appeal isless than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018dated 11[th] July, 2018.
3.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue