Case Law › High Court › Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj

Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj

High Court 12 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Apr 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Priya Soparkar 164 nma 370-19 in itxal 586-18-o-k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 370 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.586 OF 2018 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai.… Appellant /Applicant V/s. M/s TATA Sons Ltd.… Respondent --- Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for the Appellant/Applicant.Mr.Srihari Iyer for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : APRIL 12, 2019. P.C.:- 1.This notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delay of 1 day in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit filed alongwith this notice of motion, the delay iscondoned. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a). (SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.