In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
158 nma 357-19 in itxal 353-19-o-k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.357 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.353 OF 2019
Anil Popatlal Udeshi… Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Income Tax Officer-19(1)(1), Mumbai. … Respondent
---
Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Applicant/Appellant.Mr.Sham Walve for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delayof 33 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in theaffidavit filed alongwith this notice of motion, the delay iscondoned. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a).
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue