In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.367 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2624 OF 2018
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Thane. … Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Shakeeluddin Shafiuddin Siddiqui … Respondent---
Mr.Sham Walve for the Applicant/Appellant.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delayof 3 days in filing the appeal and to extend further time toremove office objections. For the reasons mentioned in theaffidavit filed alongwith this notice of motion, the delay iscondoned. and time extended to remove office objections. Noticeof motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue