In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
166 nma 372-19 in itxal 1383-17-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 372 OF 2019IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1383 OF 2017
CCIT (OSD)/Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2. … Appellant /Applicant
V/s.
Shri Bhupendra Champaklal Dalal … Respondent
---
Mr.A.K.Saxena for the Appellant/Applicant.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This notice of motion is taken out for restoration of appeal,
which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections. For
the reasons mentioned in the affidavit filed alongwith this noticeof motion, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a). Thus, time to remove office objections areextended by this order.
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue