Case Law › High Court › Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj

Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj

High Court 26 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Apr 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Priya Soparkar 146 nma 365-19 in itxal 352-19-o-k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.365 OF 2019IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.352 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai. ... Applicant/Appellant V/s. Neha Home Builders Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent --- Mr.Akhileshwar Sharm for the Applicant/Appellant.Mr.Sameer Dalal i/by Ms.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : APRIL 26, 2019. P.C.:- 1.This notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delayof 6 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in theaffidavit filed alongwith this notice of motion, the delay iscondoned. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a). (SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.