In Sarang v. Kotwal, Jj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.598 OF 2017
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-27
… Appellant
V/s.
M/s Yashomandir Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd.… Respondent
---
Mr.Ashok Kotangle with Mr.Prabhakar Ranshur for the Appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 12, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This appeal is filed by the revenue challenging the judgment
of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and relates to therectification order which is consequential to the reopening ofthe assessment. The Tribunal had held that the reopening ofassessment was invalid. The revenue had carried such order inthe Tribunal of appeal. We have by separate order passed todaydismissed the Revenue's Appeal No.112 of 2017. This appealtherefore becomes infructuous. Appeal disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V.KOTWAL,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.