Case Law › High Court › Saroj Kumar Sahoo v.

Saroj Kumar Sahoo v.

High Court 14 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Saroj Kumar Sahoo v. —

Date of order

14 Jul 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Saroj Kumar Sahoo v. , the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9750 of 2025 Saroj Kumar Sahoo -Versus- ….Petitioner Represented by Adv.–Ms. Kajal Sahoo, Advocate ….Opposite Parties Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi and others Represented by Adv.– Mr. A. Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’ BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLEMR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. 01. ORDER 14.07.2025 1. Ms. Kajal Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. A memo filed to that effect is taken on record. 2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. (Harish Tandon) Chief Justice Signature Not Verified (M.S. Raman) Digitally Signed Judge Signed by: SUBASH KUMAR GUINReason: AuthenticationS.K. Guin/PA Location: High Court of Orissa, CuttackDate: 17-Jul-2025 11:11:47

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.