Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Department
High Court
10 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Department
Date of order
10 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Taking his statement on record and binding the respondent to thesame, the petition is disposed of.same, the petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ARB.P. 1138/2025
SARVESH SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD......PetitionerThrough:Mr. Uday Malhotra, Ms. Sneha Singh,Advs.Through:Mr. Uday Malhotra, Ms. Sneha Singh,Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT.....RespondentThrough:Mr.SiddharthaSinha,SeniorStanding CounselThrough:Mr.SiddharthaSinha,SeniorStanding Counsel
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R%10.09.2025
1.This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator toadjudicate the disputes between the parties.Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator toadjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2.Mr. Sinha, learned SSC appears on behalf of the respondent and statesthat all the dues of the petitioner shall be cleared expeditiously and inany case, not later than 6 weeks from today.that all the dues of the petitioner shall be cleared expeditiously and inany case, not later than 6 weeks from today.
3.Taking his statement on record and binding the respondent to thesame, the petition is disposed of.same, the petition is disposed of.
4.In case the amounts are not paid or there are shortfalls, the petitionershall be at liberty to revive the present petition.shall be at liberty to revive the present petition.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/sp
JASMEET SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue