Sarwan Singh Nijar v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad And Another
High Court
06 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Sarwan Singh Nijar v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad And Another
Date of order
06 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Sarwan Singh Nijar v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad And Another, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/Noa2.
Decision: Vs.Income Tax Officer and Ors.reported as|2002 Supp (4) SCR 359, +2-Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of in the sameterms asinGkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd.'scase (supra).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
CWP No.7300 of 2001
428
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
Kk kCWP No.7300 of 2001
Date of Decision: 06.02.2020
Sarwan Singh Nijar
Versus
Petitioner
The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad and another|
Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate withMr. Amit Parsad, Advocatefor the petitioner.Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Tajender. K. Josni, Advocatefor the respondents.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
****
+,-The writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of noticedated 21.03.2001 (Annexure P-9) issued by the respondent No.2 undersection 143 read with Section 147 off the Income [Tax Act, 1961, proposinto re-assess the income of the petitioner for the assessment year 1992-93.+0-Learned counsel for the petitioner states that facts of the caseare covered by the decision dated 25.11.2002 of the Supreme Court inAppeal (Civil) 7731 of 2002 titled asGkn_Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs.Income Tax Officer and Ors.reported as|2002 Supp (4) SCR 359,
+2-Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of in the sameterms asinGkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd.'scase (supra). Further,petitioner is given permission to file objections, as per law, against thereasons which were supplied to him.
CWP No.7300 of 2001
+7-since the main case is disposed of, the pending application, if
any, stands disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGEFebruary 06, 2020pankaj bawejaI. Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/Noa2. Whether reportablYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.