S.a.subbaiya v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Cir 2(1) Chennai, Investigation Wingroom
High Court
21 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
S.a.subbaiya v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Cir 2(1) Chennai, Investigation Wingroom
Date of order
21 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In S.a.subbaiya v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Cir 2(1) Chennai, Investigation Wingroom, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 21.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.Nos.3575, 3579, 3580, 3581, 3583, 3586, 3587, 3589 & 3592 of2020 &W.M.P.Nos.4194, 4199, 4204, 4206, 4208, 4210, 4212, 4215&4217 of2020
S.A.Subbaiya... Petitioner in all WPs
Vs.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCentral CIR 2(1) Chennai, Investigation WingRoom No.112, No.46, Old No.108Mahatma Gandhi Road, NungambakkamChennai – 600 034.... Respondents in all WPs
Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, seeking for Writs of Certiorari to callfor the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by theRespondent in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023549427(1), in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023549498(1),DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023549554(1), in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023497993(1),DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023498051(1), in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023498217(1), in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023498264(1), in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023498313(1), in DIN.ITBA/AST/M/153C/2019-20/1023498362(1) respectively, underSection 144 read with Section 153 C of the Income Tax Act, 1961for the Assessment year 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 respectively, dated31.12.2019 and to quash the same as illegal, unreasonable,arbitrary and contrary to law.
For Petitioner: Mr.Anirudh Sriramfor Mr.Nithyaesh NatrajFor Respondent : Mr.A.P.SrinivasSenior Standing Counsel
ORDER
Mr.Anirudh Sriram, learned counsel representing the counselon record for writ petitioner in all the captioned writpetitions submits that he has sent a further e-mail dated20.09.2021 (post 11.09.2021 e-mail).
2. Scanned reproduction of the e-mail is as follows:
3. Learned counsel reiterates the contents of the aforesaide-mail dated 20.09.2021.
4. In the light of the e-mail and reiteration of the same,captioned writ petitions, which are listed under the cause listcaption 'FOR WITHDRAWAL' stands dismissed as withdrawn. Though
obvious, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed anyview or opinion on the merits of the matter. Consequently,connected WMPs are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gpa
To
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central CIR 2(1) Chennai, Investigation Wing,Room No.122, No.46, Old No.108,Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai – 600 034.
+6ccs to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel Sr No.48440
W.P.No.3575, 3579, 3580, 3581, 3583, 3586, 3587, 3589 and 3592
of 2020 &W.M.P.Nos.4194, 4199, 4204, 4206, 4208, 4210, 4212, 4215, 4217of 2020
AJS (CO)PR (22/10/2021)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.